The article shows a sharp eye for the flaws of Holacracy, or rather of the way Holacracy as a model for designing and running businesses has been implemented. The way Holacracy is known to generate problems when applied with a wider scope than the mere team scope. Implementing management and organisational principles like holacratic principles and having to abandon those within a couple of months of years after deep conflicts were created and the effectiveness of the business was put in jeopardy is treating your staff, your stakeholders and funders as guinea pigs.
Systems thinking is a versatile tool for the analysis and design of businesses operating in environments where the outcomes of actions and the results of strategic choice are highly unpredictable. This article shows how system thinking as a tool was used to address a practical question: “What do we have to do, with our stakeholders or all together, to achieve 100% responsible soy products for food, feed and other applications into and inside Europe by 2020?”. This was the leading question of a 4-day expert event realised in 2016, which convened over 30 experts from business, the public sector and civil society to find answers to the leading question.
On March the 6th, the Guildhall in London hosted Climate Bond Initiative’s Annual Climate Bond Conference. Over 600 participants representing green and climate bond issuers, investors, and underwriters discussed the current state and future of climate bonds. I participated in the event, among others as a panelist in a dialogue on defining green, which is investor shorthand for determining to what extent investments have clear and real-life environmental benefits that combat climate change. What could ‘defining green’ do for us?